Committee Evaluation

Committee Evaluation

Evaluate the effectiveness, leadership and dynamics of the board’s different committees and assess how they deliver against their terms of reference.

Evaluate the effectiveness, leadership and dynamics of the board’s different committees and assess how they deliver against their terms of reference.

Uncover strategic insights and elevate committee excellence

Uncover strategic insights and elevate committee excellence

Apply our Committee Evaluation to assess the performance, effectiveness, alignment, and composition of your board committees over time.

Take a deeper dive into connectivity with the main board, information flows, efficiency, and composition to determine if your committees deliver on the terms of reference.

Generate feedback on the committee’s performance, processes and procedures to clarify strategic objectives.

Align your committee members with business objectives and priorities – and with each other.

Pinpoint the most critical challenges, transform them into actionable insights, and elevate your committee's performance.

~30

~30

Transformative questions

Transformative questions

100%

100%

Objective methodology

Objective methodology

24/7

24/7

Access

Access

Benchmark your performance against other boards

Benchmark your performance against other boards

Access benchmarks derived from more than 2,000 board reviews, reflecting feedback from over 5,000 board members across 500 boards in 50 countries.

Access benchmarks derived from more than 2,000 board reviews, reflecting feedback from over 5,000 board members across 500 boards in 50 countries.

Seamless alignment tracking of board directors and roles

Seamless alignment tracking of board directors and roles

BoardClic’s alignment graph visually displays responses from each evaluation participant, enabling analysis of the extent of alignment between respondents.

BoardClic’s alignment graph visually displays responses from each evaluation participant, enabling analysis of the extent of alignment between respondents.